Test Automation Framework
Playwright, Cypress, or the right stack for your app — fixtures, environment config, test data handling, and docs your team can extend.
You have developers. You do not have reliable QA. That is the problem. Vectrix LLC builds a test automation system that catches critical problems before your customers do, runs inside your pipeline, and remains fully owned by your team.
Your team ships quickly. Then something breaks in production, customers report it, and everyone stops what they are doing to investigate. The next sprint, it happens somewhere else.
You do not need an entire internal QA department. You need a test automation system that catches critical problems before your customers do, runs inside your pipeline, and remains fully owned by your team.
What we build: A focused suite you trust beats hundreds of flaky tests nobody runs.
Vectrix LLC is a US-based QA automation company in Tampa, Florida. We help teams that already have developers — and teams whose existing suite is slow, flaky, or ignored.
Book a Free QA ReviewMost testing companies work from a checklist. We work as engineers — because we build software ourselves.
We understand how architecture, integrations, test data, async processes, and deployment environments create failures that never show up in a requirements doc.
Most of our QA clients already have their own developers. We supply the strategy, framework, and release controls their team does not have time to build.
Playwright, Cypress, or the right stack for your app — fixtures, environment config, test data handling, and docs your team can extend.
A suite that answers “did we break something?” in minutes on every pull request, focused on high-risk functionality first.
Critical money paths — signup, checkout, onboarding, payment — not every button on every page.
Endpoints, auth, permissions, responses, and data integrity with Postman or REST Assured — faster and less brittle than browser tests.
k6 and JMeter against realistic traffic: concurrent users, response times, throughput, and spike behavior.
Suite wired into GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or Jenkins so broken tests block unsafe merges before they ship.
Audit the suite your team stopped trusting, fix root causes, and make green builds mean something again.
axe, Lighthouse, and WCAG checks plus critical journeys across browsers and devices with BrowserStack.
Playwright, Cypress, Selenium, and Appium for browser and mobile coverage that stays maintainable.
Postman, REST Assured, k6, and JMeter for contract checks, load testing, and fast feedback loops.
Jest, Vitest, and Pytest layered under E2E so regression risk is caught as early as possible.
GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, BrowserStack, axe, Lighthouse, TestRail, Jira, and Xray.
We review your repo, release process, existing tests, and recent production issues — then surface the highest business risk.
We decide what to automate, what stays manual, and what does not need ongoing testing at all.
Foundation in place with the first critical-path tests running and documented.
Coverage grows sprint by sprint, ordered by business risk — not vanity metrics.
Suite connected to your pipeline so failed critical tests can block unsafe merges or deploys.
Docs, a developer walkthrough, and a framework your team can extend. Ownership is the goal.
Indicative ranges for common engagements. We confirm a fixed estimate after reviewing your app, existing tests, and critical journeys.
$1,500 – $3,000
$6,000 – $12,000
$12,000 – $30,000
$4,000 – $10,000
From $3,500/mo
$5,000 – $15,000
QA review fee is credited against your first engagement. Price moves with critical flows, test readiness, data setup, and mobile or cross-browser needs.
Product-market fit, no QA, every release a gamble. Start with a framework and the five flows that matter.
You have tests — slow, flaky, and ignored. We make the suite trustworthy again.
You build for clients but lack a QA function. We plug in per project — white-labeled if you want.
Build a credible QA process, release controls, and docs you can present in technical reviews.
You work with our QA automation engineer by name, start to finish — not a rotating pool of resources.
Tests, CI config, and docs live in your repo. Goal: make your team capable, not dependent.
We cover journeys where a defect costs revenue or trust — a focused reliable suite over hundreds of flaky tests.
We also build software, so testing decisions respect architecture, deploy environments, and long-term maintainability.
Tampa office, US business hours, a named contact, and responses within one business day.
Developers test that their code works. QA tests that the system works, including the paths nobody thought about. They are different jobs, and asking one person to do both means one of them gets skipped. Usually the second one.
When a bug reaching production costs you more than the tests would have. For most teams that is around the point where you have paying customers and three or more developers shipping. Before that, focus on shipping. And when you get there, you do not need a full-time QA hire — a framework covering your five most important flows usually does the job.
Both, but for different things. Automate anything you will run more than a few times: regression, critical paths, API checks. Keep manual for exploratory testing, new features, and anything a human eye catches better. Anyone who tells you to automate 100% is selling you hours.
There is no correct number, and chasing a coverage percentage is a trap. Cover the flows where a bug costs you money or trust. A suite of 30 tests you trust beats 300 you skip.
Flaky tests usually come from bad waits, shared test data, or tests that depend on each other’s state. It is fixable, but it has to be fixed, because a suite your team does not trust is worse than no suite. Once people start re running the build until it goes green, the tests have stopped doing their job.
Yes, that is most of our QA work. We start by reading the code and the release history to find where it actually breaks, not just where the requirements say it should work.
A framework and your first critical path tests: two to four weeks. Meaningful regression coverage: six to eight weeks. You will see the first tests running in CI within the first two weeks.
The framework, the tests, the CI configuration, and documentation your developers can actually use, all in your repository. Plus a walkthrough session with your team. It is yours, and you can extend it without us.
Yes. Most of our QA automation engagements are delivered alongside an internal development team. We can work independently on the framework, collaborate directly with developers during each sprint or provide an embedded part time QA automation engineer. The working model depends on your release frequency, internal capability and desired level of support.
Show us your app, repository, or release process. We will flag the highest-risk areas and recommend a practical starting scope — no long-term commitment.